Skip to main content

Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease Diagnosed by Echocardiogram Patient Admitted in a Rural Setup Tertiary Hospital

 Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease Diagnosed by Echocardiogram Patient Admitted in a Rural Setup Tertiary Hospital

Ahmed TU1,  Rahman MM2, Quddush ASMR3

Abstract

Background & objective: Congenital heart disease is a defect in the structure of heart and great vessels present at birth. Early recognition will help to treat the child and if possible get corrective surgery done. The aim of this study was to observe the pattern of congenital heart disease in our set-up.


Patients and Methods: This descriptive study based on echocardiographic findings over a period of 3 year from January 2013 to December 2015 conducted in Community Based Medical College Bangladesh. Mymensingh. Patients consent was obtained from patient’s parents before echocardiography. A total of 100 children found to have congenital heart disease by echocardiography were studied and analysed for frequencies of lesions, sex ratio and mean age.


Results: One hundred patients, comprising 55(55%) male and 45(45%) female had congenital heart disease diagnosed by echocardiogram, their age ranged from 0.01 to 15 years with a mean age of 6.4 ± 5.3 years and male to female ratio 1.2:1. Sixty six percent of patients were diagnosed as non cyanotic heart defects and rest 34% cyanotic heart defects. Atrial septal defect (35%) was the most frequent form of non-cyanotic congenital heart defect, followed by ventricular septal defect (15%), pulmonary stenosis (6%), patent ductus arteriosus (5%), endocardial cushion defect (3%) and coarctation of aorta (2%). Whereas fallot’s tetralogy (17%) followed by transposion of great arteries (10%) and ebstein’s anomaly (7%) were the commonest cyanotic congenital heart defects. 


Conclusion: Congenital heart diseases are common in our set-up. Atrial septal defect is the commonest non-cyanotic and Fallot’s tetrology as cyanotic congenital heart disease.

CBMJ 2015 July: Vol. 04 No. 02 P: .....

Key words: Congenital heart disease, Cyanotic congenital heart disease, Non cyanotic congenital heart disease, Echocardiography

Introduction

Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the malformation of the heart or the large blood vessels associated with the heart, affecting various parts or function. It is one of the leading causes of mortality in the first year of life.1-3 CHDs are the common single group of abnormalities accounting for about 30% of the total congenital abnormalities.1 It has been estimated that some types of CHDs can be related to the defects in the chromosome, gene or environmental factors.4 In ~90% of the CHD cases, there is no identifiable cause that can be attributed as multifactorial defects. The majority of these structural abnormalities occur as isolated malformation in most patients, but about 33% have associated anomalies.5


CHD may present at different ages from birth to adolescence.6 The estimated incidence of CHD is 9 per 1,000 live births which correspond to 1.35 million newborns with CHD every year, representing a major global health burden.7 The incidence of CHD in Bangladesh is 25/1000 live birth; in India is 8.54 per 1000 live birth;8 in Pakistani population is 11 per 1000 live birth.9 Congenital heart defects are the most common type of birth defect in the United States, affecting nearly 1% of about 40,000 births per year.10 In Europe the average total prevalence of CHD was 8.0 per 1000 births and live birth prevalence was 7.2 per 1000 births.11 




1. *Dr. Tofayel Uddin Ahmed 

Assistant Professor, Department of cardiology

Community Based Medical College, Bangladesh



2. Prof. Dr. M. Mafizur Rahman

  Professor  & Head of the Department of cardiology

Community Based Medical College, Bangladesh


3. Dr. ASM Rushul quddush

Associate professor department of pediatric

Community Based Medical College, Bangladesh.


*Address of correspondence 

Email: tuahmed@gmail.com

Phone: +8801711906682



Pattern of CHD varies from country to country, region to region. According to the Merck Manual of Diagnosis,12 the different types of CHDs are Atrial Septal Defect (ASD), Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD), Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA), Pulmonary Stenosis (PS), Aortic Stenosis (AS), Coarctation of Aorta (COA) and Atrioventricular Septal Defect (AVSD) which accounts for 85% of all CHDs. The remaining 15% of rare and complex CHDs are Persistent Truncus Arteriosus (PTA), Tricuspid Atresia (TA), Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection (TAPVC), Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (HLHS), Double Outlet Right Ventricle (DORV), Single Ventricle (SV), Ebstein Anomaly (EA) and Dextrocardia. In developed countries pattern of CHD is well documented. However, there are no epidemiological data available on the pattern of congenital heart disease but a study  published on clinical basis in our hospital “case study profile of congenital heart disease” by Professor Mafizur rahman and Professor M. Karim khan in Journal of Community Health Medical Research December,   1999;5:19-21.[38]. Therefore, the present study report pattern of congenital heart diseases admitted diagnose by echocardiogram in a rural tertiary hospital in Mymensingh, Bangladesh.


Subjects and Methods

This descriptive study based on echocardiographic findings over a period of 3 year from January 2013 to December 2015 conducted in Community Based Medical College Bangladesh. Mymensingh. Patients consent was obtained from patient’s parents before echocardiography. A total of 100 children (aged from birth to 15 years) found to have congenital heart disease by echocardiography were studied. Transthoracic M-mode, 2D and Doppler echocardiography (pulsed, continuous – wave and color flow mapping) were performed in different views. Standard diagnostic echocardiographic criteria were used to identify the congenital defects according to their structural characteristics and/or hemodynamic effects. Transthoracic  echo done by echocardiographiy Machine: Model Tosiba Nemio MX Model SSA-590A (Fig-1) . Transducer 7 MHz PSM-70AT (Child), Transducer 3 MHz PSM-30BT (Adult) (Fig-2). TEE not done. 











Fig-1: Echocardiographiy Machine: Model Tosiba Nemio MX Model SSA-590A









Fig-2: Transducer 7 MHz PSM-70AT (Child), Transducer 3 MHz PSM-30BT (Adult) 


The CHD were classified into cyanotic or non-cyanotic according to the standards established.13 Patients with more than one heart defect were classified according to the malformation that precipitated the presentation and produced the major hemodynamic disturbance. Severity of CHD was considered ‘complex’ when a valve or chamber was atretic or hypoplastic, ‘significant’ when treatment was mandatory and ‘minor’ when surgical intervention was unnessasary.14 Patients aged more than 15 years and those that had mitral valve prolapse, minor abnormalities of the great veins or branches of the aortic arch, congenital arrhythmias, hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, rheumatic heart disease and bicuspid aortic valve without stenosis or regurgitation were excluded. Congenital anomalies were classified according to the International Classification of Disease (ICD – 10).15 A questionnaire including clinical and laboratory data was completed for all cases. The survey data were checked, coded, computerized and comparing using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, Version 11.5). Descriptive statistics was used to report the findings and all these data were analyzed and presented in the form of tables and graphs as frequencies and percentages.


Results

One hundred patients, comprising 55(55%) male and 45(45%) female had congenital heart disease diagnosed by echocardiogram, their age ranged from 0.01 to 15 years with a mean age of 6.4 ± 5.3 years and male to female ratio 1.2:1. Over one third (34%) of the patients were between 1 – 5 years of age, 27% between 11 – 15 years, 21% below 1 years and rest 18% between 6 – 10 years (Table I). Major clinical presentations were dyspnoea (92%), fatigue (90%), recurrent chest infection (72%), delayed development (68%), congenital abnormalities (60%), found on R.E (59%) and FTT (53%). Other symptoms were CCF (42%), cyanosis (37%), hypoxic spells (23%) (Table II). Sixty six (66%) of the total cases had non-cyanotic heart defects. Cyanotic heart defects were seen in 34 patients (34%) (Figure-3). Atrial septal defect (35%) was the most frequent form of non-cyanotic congenital heart defects, followed by ventricular septal defect (15%), pulmonary stenosis (6%), patent ductus arteriosus (5%), endocardial cushion defect (3%) and coarctation of aorta (2%). Whereas fallot’s tetralogy (17%) followed by transposion of great arteries (10%) and ebstein’s anomaly (7%) were the commonest cyanotic congenital heart defects as shown in Table III. The frequencies of specific form of CHD are presented in table IV. Patients with ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, patent ductus arteriosus, endocardial cushion defect, coarctation of aorta and ebstein’s anomaly had male predominance compared to female (53.3% vs. 46.7%; 66.7% vs. 33.3%; 100% vs. 0%; 66.7% vs. 33.3%; 100% vs.0%; 71.4% vs. 28.6% respectively). Atrial septal defect was the common CHD. It was found in 17(48.6%) male and 18(51.5%) female with male to female ratio 0.9:1. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.3 ± 0.9 years. Ventricular septal defect was the second most frequent CHD, seen in 8(53.3%) male and 7(46.7%) female with male to female ratio of 1.1:1 and mean age at diagnosis of 5.5 ± 1.2 years. Fallot’s tetralogy a cyanotic heart disease was diagnosed in 7(41.2%) male and 10(58.8%) female with male to female ratio 0.7:1 and mean age 3.9 ± 0.6 years. Transposion of great arteries and ebstein’s anomaly were diagnosed in 10 patients (5(50%) male and 5(50%) female and male to female ratio 1:1 with mean age 2.5 ± 0.9 years) and in 7 patients (5(71.4%) male and 2(28.6%) female and male to female ratio 2.5:1 with mean age 7.2 ± 2.5 years) respectively. 


Table-I: Age & sex distribution of patients of congenital heart disease (n = 100)

Age (years)

No. of male

No. of female 

Total (percentage)

<1

11

10

21(21.0)

1 – 5

18

16

34(34.0)

6 – 10

11

07

18(18.0)

11 – 15 

15

12

27(27.0)

* Mean age = (6.4 ± 5.3) years; range = (0.01 – 15) years.


Table II: Symptoms/signs of patients of congenital heart disease (n = 100)

Symptoms

Frequency

percentage

Recurrent chest infection

72

72.0

Dyspnoea

92

92.0

Found on R.E.

59

59.0

Hypoxic spells

23

23.0

CCF

42

42.0

Delayed development

68

68.0

Cyanosis

37

37.0

Congenital abnormalities

60

60.0

FTT

53

53.0

Fatigue

90

90.0


* Total will not correspond to 100% for multiple responses.














Fig. 3: Type of congenital heart disease (n = 100)


Table III: Relative frequency of congenital heart disease (n = 100)

Heart defects

Frequency

Percentage

Non-cyanotic

Ventricular septal defect

Pulmonary stenosis

Patent ductus arteriosus

Atrial septal defect

Endocardial cushion defect

Coarctation of aorta


15

06

05

35

03

02


15.0

6.0

5.0

35.0

3.0

2.0

Cyanotic

Fallot’s tetralogy

Transposion of great arteries

Ebstein’s anomaly


17

10

07


17.0

10.0

7.0


Table IV: Distribution of specific type of congenital heart disease.


Lesion

Male


Female


Male : Female

Mean age 

at diagnosis (yrs)

Ventricular septal defect

8(53.3)

7(46.7)

1.1:1

5.5 ± 1.2

Pulmonary stenosis

4(66.7)

2(33.3)

2:1

5.4 ± 1.6

Patent ductus arteriosus

5(100.0)

00

Male

9.3 ± 3.1

Atrial septal defect

17(48.6)

18(51.4)

0.9:1

9.3 ± 0.9

Endocardial cushion defect

2(66.7)

1(33.3)

2:1

1.5 ± 1.2

Coarctation of aorta

2(100.0)

00

Male

2.8 ± 0.7

Fallot’s tetralogy

7(41.2)

10(58.8)

0.7:1

3.9 ± 0.6

Transposion of great arteries

5(50.0)

5(50.0)

1:1

2.5 ± 0.9

Ebstein’s anomaly

5(71.4)

2(28.6)

2.5:1

7.2 ± 2.5


# Figures in the parentheses denote corresponding percentage.

Discussion

Congenital heart diseases are among the more common major malformations at birth.16 In developing countries thousands of children die due to CHD.17 One quarter of all deaths from CHD occur in the 1st month of life and half to two third of deaths occur within 1st seven to ten days of life.18,19 The pattern of CHD varies depending upon patient’s age and country development. Studies on patients of different ages reveal that complex defects (hypoplastic left heart syndrome, mittral and aortic atresia) are common in the autopsy of fetus and neonates;14 significant defects (transposition of great arteries, Fallot’s Tetralogy and so forth) predominant in neonates and infants.20,21  and minor defects (ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, atrial septal defect and so forth) in older children.       In developed countries, this pattern has been modified in such a way that nowadays, CHD is considered a disease of adults as well as children.22  The use of echocardiography and routine clinical screening of neonates and infants allow the detection of heart defects at a very early stage, which make the decision on therapeutic abortion or early surgical correction easier.23,24 In the developing countries, where there is a shortage of health services, however, the pattern still resembles that of the presurgical era.25 The majority of patients are never diagnosed, those in critical stages die and survivors are diagnosed too late. Up till now in our country childbirth occurs at home and necropsy has not been included within the medical practice yet. Therefore, it is difficult to ascertain the true pattern of CHD.  


The result of our study shows that although 73% of patients with congenital heart disease were diagnosed before age of 10 years, only 21% were diagnosed before age of 1 year. The peak age of diagnosis of our patients was between 1 – 5 years.  This is relatively late compared with developed countries in which most cases are detected during the neonatal period. Early diagnosis of these lesions in the Western world may be due to the fact that routine foetal echocardiographic examination forms part of ante-natal care.26 Males were affected predominantly in our study with a mean age of 6.4 ± 5.3 years and male to female ratio 1.2:1 which differ from findings of  Marelli et al. (2007)22 & Baspinar et al. (2006)27 but accordance with other studies of  Sani et al.28  & Kolo et al. (2012).29 Whereas, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, patent ductus arteriosus, endocardial cushion defect, coarctation of aorta and ebstein’s anomaly were commoner in males and atrial septal defect and fallot’s tetralogy were commoner in females. The major clinical presentation of patients were dyspnoea, fatigue, recurrent chest infection, delayed development and congenital abnormalities. These findings are almost similar in the study of Memon et al30 demonstrated that dyspnoea, recurrent chest infection, delayed development, congenital abnormalities and hypoxic spells were the main symptoms of the patients. 


The pattern of distribution of types of CHD encountered in this study was very different from other studies, whether conducted in our country or in other countries. The most common CHD in this study was atrial septal defect (35%), which is consistent with the findings of previous studies from Nigeria28,31 and from other parts of the world,32-36 but different to a report from  South Africa.37 Also the studies in Bangladesh Rahman et al.,38 Siddique et al.39 and Begum et al.40 found ASD the commonest lesion. The second most common CHD in this study was ventricular septal defect (15%). This is less compare to the worldwide incidence (25–30%)41 and others reported by Masood et al.42 (25%) and Abbag32 (32.5%) and Burki & Babar43 (29%) and Shann (43.4%).44 Pulmonary stenosis is the next common CHD (6%) in this study, followed by patent ductus arteriosus (5%) and endocardial cushion defect (3%). Almost similar study in Jordan reported by Amro45 showed that pulmonary stenosis in 6.2%, patent ductus arteriosus in 8.3% and endocardial cushion defect in 4.1% of patients. This observation is contrary to the study of Sharmin et al.46 in Bangladesh found that pulmonary stenosis in 1.7%, patent ductus arteriosus in 7.8% and coarctation of aorta in 1.7% of patients. There is a significant difference in the incidence of Coarctation of aorta in the developing countries as compared to that of developed countries. It is reported to be 2% in our study as compared to 10.2% in Sweden.47 Among the cyanotic lesions Tetralogy of Fallot was the commonest congenital heart lesion followed by transposition of the great arteries and ebstein’s anomaly. This is comparable with the study in Taiwan where the commonest cyanotic cardiac lesion was Tetralogy of Fallot and then  transposition of the great arteries.48 In another study Tetralogy of Fallot was most common but transposition of the great arteries was earlier to present.49 This variation could be due to either a genetic or an environmental factor, such as the higher incidence of congenital infections and consanguineous marriages in some parts of the developing countries compared to the developed countries.50 


In developed countries early detection and surgical intervention have provided a high chance of survival in children with CHD but in developing countries like Bangladesh the facilities for diagnosis and treatment of children with CHD are limited to larger cities and quite expansive and beyond the reach of poor, so many children die before diagnosis at an early age. To improve the survival of children with CHD there is need to diagnose and treat CHD at earliest age by provision of diagnostic and surgical facilities at each corner of the country in order to intervene successfully.


Conclusion

Congenital heart diseases are still common in our society and constituting a big health problem. Majority of patients with CHD detected noncyanotic congenital heart disease. Atrial septal defect is the commonest non-cyanotic and Fallot’s tetrology as cyanotic congenital heart disease. In order to avoid complications, early detection of congenital heart disease is of utmost importance for proper management.


References

  1. Noonan JA, Ehmke DA. Associated non cardiac malformations in children with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 1963; 63: 468-71.

  2. Greenwood RD. The cardiac examination in children. Am Fam Physic 1985;105-16.

  3. Quiroga M, Garcia E. Morbimortalidad perinatal. Bol Med Hosp Infant 1979;36:871-84. 

  4. http://www.americanheartassociation.com/Heart disease and stroke statistics-2003. 

  5. Frias JL. Genetic issues of congenital heart disease. In: Gessner IH, Victrorica BE, editors. Pediatric cardiology. Saunders: Philadelphia, 1993; p. 237-42.

  6. Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Pesentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implication for routine examination. Arch Dis child Fetal neonatal Ed. 1999;80:49-52. 

  7. Linde DV, Konings EEM, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJM, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2241-47. 

  8. Bhat NK, Dhar M, Kumar R, Patel A, Rawat A, Kalra BP. Prevalence and pattern of congenital heart disease in Uttarkhand, India. Indian J Pediatr 2013; 80:281-85. 

  9. Agadoorappa P, Oddie S, Pawson N, Sheridon E. Do Pakistani babies have more congenital heart defects? Preliminary findings from our birth cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96:35. 

  10. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in Atlanta, 1998-2005. J Pediatrics 2008; 153:807-13. 

  11. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT). Working group congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation 2011;123:841-49. 

  12. http://www.americanheartassociation.com/The Merck Manual of Diagnosis. 

  13. Bernstein D. Congenital Heart Disease. In Kliegman MR, Beherman ER, Jenson BH, editors. Nelson Textbook  of pediatric. 18th edn. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders 2007; p.1881-82.

  14. Abu – Harb M, Hay E, Wren C. Death in infancy from unrecognized  congenital heart disease. Arch Dis Child 1994; 71: 3-7. 

  15. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th Revision 2006. 

  16. Hurst T, Shafir E, Lancaster P. Congenital malformation, Australia, 1997. Birth defect series (no.4e) Sydeny: National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2001. 

  17. Cohen AJ, Tamir A, Houri S, Abegaz B, Gilad E, Omahkdion S et.al. Ann. Thorac-Surg 2001;17(2):462-68.


  1. Keith JD, Rowe RD, Vlad P, editors. Prevalence, incidence and epidemiology. In: Heart disease in infancy and childhood, 3rd edn. Macmillan: NewYork 1978; p.3.

  2. Levin AR. Management of the cyanotic newborn. Peiatr Ann 1981;10:16. 

  3. Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW. Congenital heart disease in 56,109 births. Incidence and natural history. Circulation 1971;43:323-32.

  4. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1890-1900.

  5. Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital heart disease in the general population. Changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation 2007; 115;163-72. 

  6. Allen SW, Gauvreau K, Bloom BT, Jenkins KJ. Evidences-based referral  results in significantly reduced mortality after congenital heart surgery. Pediatrics 2003;112:24-8.

  7. Miyague NI, Cardoso SM, Meyer F, Ultramari FT, Araujo FH, Rozkowisk I. Epidemiological study of congenital heart defects in children and adolescents. Analysis of 4,538 cases. Arq Bras Cardiol 2003; 80:269-78. 

  8. Samanek M, Benesova D, Goetzova J, Hrycejova I. Distribution of age at death in children with congenital heart disease who died before the age of 15. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 581-85. 

  9. Sullivan ID. Pre-natal diagnosis of structural heart disease:does it make a difference to survival. Heart 2002; 87:405-6. 

  10. Baspinar O, Karaaslan S, Oran B, Baysal T, Elmaci AM, Yorulmaz A. Prevalence and distribution of congenital heart diseases in the central Anatolian region of Turkey. Turk J Pediatr. 2006; 48: 237-43.

  11. Sani MU, Mukhtar-Yola M, Karaye KM. Spectrum of congenital heart disease in a tropical environment: an echocardiography study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007; 99: 665-69.  

  12. Kolo PM, Adeoye PO, Omotoso A B, Afolabi JK. Pattern of congenital heart disease in Ilorin, Nigeria. The Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 2012; 19(4):230-34.

  13. Memon Y, Majeed R, Memon F. Pattern of congenital heart disease at Liaquat University Hospital Hyderabad. Pakistan Heart Journal 2007;40(1):9-13.

  14. Caddell JL, Morton P. Pattern of congenital heart disease in Yoruba children of Western Nigeria. Am Heart J. 1967;73: 431-32. 

  15. Abbag F. Pattern of congenital heart disease in southwestern region of Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 1998; 18: 393-95.

  16. Hoffman JIE, Christianson R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol 1978; 42: 641-47.

  17. Feldt RH, Avasthey P, Yoshimasu F, Kurland LT, Titus JL. Incidence of congenital heart disease in children born to residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota 1950-1969. Mayo Clin Proc 1971; 46: 794-99.

  18. Bound JP, Logan WF. Incidence of congenital heart disease in Blackpool 1957-1971. Br Heart J 1977; 39: 445-50.

  19. Tofler OB. Congenital heart disease in aboriginals. Med J Aust. 1979;1:620. 

  20. Schrire V. Experience with congenital heart disease at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town: an analysis of 1439 patients studied over an eleven-year period. S Afr Med J. 1963; 37: 1175-80. 




  1. Rahman M, Khan MK. Case study profile of congenital heart disease. Journal of Community Health Medical Research 1999;5:19-21

  2. Siddique FM, Kamal SMM, Huq KMHSS. Clinical presentation of congenital heart disease in hospitalized patients. Bangladesh Heart Journal 1989; 4: 13-7.

  3. Begum NNF, Ahmed QS. Pattern of heart disease among neonates and their outcome: one year experience in non- invasive cardiac laboratory of Combined Military Hospital, Dhaka. Bangladesh J child health 2001; 25: 48-52. 

  4. Brestein D. Epidemiology and genetic basis of congenital heart disease prevalence. Nelson Test Book of Pediatrics, 18th edn. 2007;p.1878–81. 

  5. Masood N, Sharif M, Asghar RM. Frequency of congenital heart diseases at Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 2010;6:120-23. 


  1. Burki MK, Babar GS. Prevalence and pattern of congenital heart diseases in azara. J Ayub Med Coll 2001;13:16-8. 

  2. Shann M. Congenital heart disease in Taiwan, Republic of China. Circulation 1969;39:35-9. 

  3. Amro K. Pattern of congenital heart disease in Jordan. Eur J Gen Med 2009; 6(3): 161-65. 


  1. Sharmin LS, Haque MA, Bari MI, Ali MA. Pattern and clinical profile of congenital heart disease in a teaching hospital. TAJ 2008; 21(2): 58-62. 

  2. Pradat P. Epidemiology of major congenital heart defects in Sweden, 1981-1986. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46:211-15.

  3. AI E Hag. Pattern of congenital heart disease in Sudanese children. East Afr Med J 1994;71(9):580-86. 

  4. Hassan M. Assessment of a child with congenital heart disease. Pak J Med Sci 1989;5(3);75-9.

  5. Tank S, Malik S, Joshi S. Epidemiology of congenital heart disease among hospitalized children. BHJ 2004. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Duties of Staff Nurse.

  Duties of Staff Nurse. 1 They arc responsible for the cleanliness and tidiness of the ward including surroundings of the ward, lavatories and bathrooms 2 They will make the patients' environment clean and tidy. They will make bedding of the patients. 3 They will maintain ledgers relating to cquipment,all articles of the ward. 4 Articles of bedding or clothing used by patient of contagious or infectious diseases should be disinfected before sending them to linen Store or dhobi. Linen used by patients of tetanus, anthrax etc will be kept and transmitted to ward master or burning with the consent of the Hospital Secretary / Director 5 They will intimate to their respective Registrars every morning or earliest convenience particulars of patients discharged, dead, transferred or admitted during the previous day. They report should at least contain the following information (a) Name of patient (b) Date of admission , discharge, trans fer or death (c) Department with unit (d) ward numbe

A Case of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries (CCTGA)

A Case of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries (CCTGA)  Abstract  Recent years, much scientific attention has been given to congenital heart diseases (CHD) and probable complications. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA) is a rare, complex form of congenital heart defects. CCTGA is characterized by atrioventricular (AV) and ventriculoarterial (VA) discordance and hence by a physiologically normal direction of blood flow sometimes called “double discordance”. The development of complete AV block and global ventricular dysfunction has been identified as the cause of cardiac death. This paper presents a case of CCTGA with rhythm disorders and exertional dyspnea.  Keywords: Congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries; arrhythmias  Introduction  Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries of the heart is a rare form of congenital heart disease that was first described by Von Rokitansky in 1875 [1]. Male female ratio i